Monthly burn
Separate recurring operating burn from one-off R&D project costs and identify when cash pressure is expected to peak.
R&D teams often pay engineers, developers, scientists, contractors and suppliers well before a tax benefit is realised. A funding plan should map this operating cycle rather than focusing only on the anticipated claim.
Funding should address a defined business need and sit within a credible plan for the company after the facility is advanced.
Separate recurring operating burn from one-off R&D project costs and identify when cash pressure is expected to peak.
Map expenditure, registration, tax-return preparation and expected tax outcomes on one timeline.
Model what happens if technical milestones or the tax cycle take longer than expected.
business.gov.au describes a cash-flow forecast as an estimate of future sales and costs that helps identify shortages and surpluses. Use a month-by-month forecast for payroll, contractors, cloud/technical costs, prototypes, customer receipts and tax payments.
Identify expenditure already contractually committed, expenditure needed to preserve the core team and optional projects that can be delayed if the downside case occurs.
Use scenarios for timing and amount rather than assuming the anticipated R&D benefit arrives on one exact date. The facility should remain manageable under a slower outcome.
Where possible, link additional capital to technical or commercial milestones such as prototype completion, release, customer contract, production readiness or revenue conversion.
General information only. This page does not constitute legal, tax, financial or credit advice. SME Capital Partners is in pre-launch and is not currently offering or approving credit through this website.